This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
What are the l a s t four characters of "92843242aef63749bef45cea"? You must also add "xx!1.." to the answer but type "1" as a word not a number.
Smilies
:clap: :crazy: :thumbdown: :thumbup: :wtf: :yawn: :tired: :relaxed: :grin: :smile: :wink: :sad: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :razz: :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek: :eh: :lolno: :problem: :shh: :shifty: :sick: :silent: :think: :wave:
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Steven W, 2014-01-05 23:25 »

As stated, I really did like Winamp many moons ago. I remember watching the decline. The introduction of a video player was, in my opinion, a bad move. Then there was the advertising that starting up (even in the paid for version):

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=280976

Can't believe that thread is still around.


Here's an article about how some employees say it went downhill:

http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/06 ... id-itself/

I found the bit about AOL buying two companies and tossing them together particularly amusing, I found myself in practically the same situation in the past couple of years:

http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/06 ... id-itself/

It is amazing how these huge corporations believe that they are indestructible or offer something of such great value that is irreplaceable. Hello, Microsoft? Anybody home?:

And that pointed to a bigger problem for Winamp, and for the "Winamp culture" inside AOL-its primary users were music fans, geeks, and people who cared about what bitrate their MP3s were encoded at-in other words, the key users of Winamp in the early 2000s were allergic to AOL as a company. (Or perhaps were just put off by all those AOL promo CDs.)


Heh, I remember in those days getting the relatively inexpensive dial-up service from the phone company and in the back of my mind wondering what made AOL so great -- thinking perhaps I was missing something. Finally saw AOL from a new friend and realized there was nothing that made it so great.

MasterOne, 2014-01-05 13:49 »

I never liked Winamp. It was bloated by the time I got around to trying it. I used to use XMMS on Linux which had a similar UI to Winamp, but was of course a better piece of software.

!, 2014-01-03 14:16 »

Steven W wrote:...The speculation that Microsoft would buy Winamp is pretty ridiculous.

Indeed. Those motherfuckers and their fucking Windows Media Player, that thing is a big joke. Totally unusable. I managed to trim the new bloated Winamp down to a very few files some years ago. I think around only 14 files. :D

Winamp reminds me of the good old days of the Internet and personal computing era. It used to be fun times. Before Facebook and Twitter existed. Everyone was on IRC. :mrgreen:

Winamp goes to radionomy

Steven W, 2014-01-03 00:04 »

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/2391/ ... ionomy.htm

Winamp has received a fresh lease of life. The music player, which was supposed to shut down on Dec. 20, has been rescued, not by Microsoft as earlier speculated, but by Brussels, Belgium-based Internet radio stations aggregator Radionomy.


I used to love Winamp. Over the years it became more and more bloated. I still keep a couple of old versions 2.x around. The speculation that Microsoft would buy Winamp is pretty ridiculous.

Top