MasterOne, 2014-01-31 20:03 »
I don't think there's anything wrong with somebody selling software, or people buying software. The problem I have, is that closed source software titles regularly have spy features, and can't be verified as to whether or not they have back doors. With closed source software, the developer has control over the user's machine, and the user has to "just trust" the developer that no malicious features were put in. With open source and free software (not as in price), it puts the users in control of their computing. With open source and free software, projects can grow very large and have millions of eyes on the code. I just think it's a better model for development, and I think it's been proven that the open source model is more secure on average than the closed source model.
On one hand, we have the open source camp who thinks open source is the way to go for technical reasons. Then we have the free software camp, who thinks free software is the way to go because of moral issues. Some people believe so strongly in one or the other or both of the aforementioned ideologies, that it's given closed source software developers a real run for their money. I have no problem with that, because it's the way things evolve.
I don't think there's anything wrong with somebody selling software, or people buying software. The problem I have, is that closed source software titles regularly have spy features, and can't be verified as to whether or not they have back doors. With closed source software, the developer has control over the user's machine, and the user has to "just trust" the developer that no malicious features were put in. With open source and free software (not as in price), it puts the users in control of their computing. With open source and free software, projects can grow very large and have millions of eyes on the code. I just think it's a better model for development, and I think it's been proven that the open source model is more secure on average than the closed source model.
On one hand, we have the open source camp who thinks open source is the way to go for technical reasons. Then we have the free software camp, who thinks free software is the way to go because of moral issues. Some people believe so strongly in one or the other or both of the aforementioned ideologies, that it's given closed source software developers a real run for their money. I have no problem with that, because it's the way things evolve.