Steven W, 2014-02-16 17:34 »
Well, isn't this interesting?
http://www.benedelman.org/news/021314-1.html ...I am able to share them with the public-because two MADA documents became available during recent litigation: In Oracle America v. Google, the HTC MADA and Samsung MADA were admitted as Trial Exhibit 286 and 2775, respectively. Though both documents indicate in their footers that they are "highly confidential - attorney's eyes only," both documents were admitted in open court (the clerk's minutes indicate no admission under seal), and court staff confirm that both documents are available in the case records in the court clerk's office. (However, the documents are not available for direct download in PACER. Instead, PACER docket number 1205 references "five boxes of trial exhibits placed on overflow shelf.")
As for the Mobile Application Distribution Agreement itself:
http://www.benedelman.org/docs/htc-mada.pdfIt seems to me that some effort could have been made to get them on PACER (
http://www.pacer.gov/).
Well, isn't this interesting?
http://www.benedelman.org/news/021314-1.html
[quote] ...I am able to share them with the public-because two MADA documents became available during recent litigation: In Oracle America v. Google, the HTC MADA and Samsung MADA were admitted as Trial Exhibit 286 and 2775, respectively. Though both documents indicate in their footers that they are "highly confidential - attorney's eyes only," both documents were admitted in open court (the clerk's minutes indicate no admission under seal), and court staff confirm that both documents are available in the case records in the court clerk's office. (However, the documents are not available for direct download in PACER. Instead, PACER docket number 1205 references "five boxes of trial exhibits placed on overflow shelf.") [/quote]
As for the Mobile Application Distribution Agreement itself:
http://www.benedelman.org/docs/htc-mada.pdf
It seems to me that some effort could have been made to get them on PACER (http://www.pacer.gov/).