Steven W, 2019-09-22 09:03 »
MrMateczko wrote: ↑2019-09-20 22:11
I doubt he would ever wanted to be associated with such behavior, no matter what you might have thought of him.
....delicate things such as death should be respected.
There's no doubt that the guy was intelligent. I do have to say, that de-compiling Microsoft's work and selling (redistributing) the results, is at best, dubious BEHAVIOR. Then trying to say that nobody can reverse engineer his patch after having done the same thing to Microsoft, well I'll spare you the full details of what I think of that BEHAVIOR. Suffice it to say, it's not good. I plan on revisiting this problem sometime, but no worries, whether I succeed or not, I won't steal his precious-wecious, ill-gotten "intellectual property".
As for death being delicate, it happens to all of us eventually and from what I've seen of it, there's nothing delicate about it.
![death01.jpg](./download/file.php?id=10362)
- death01.jpg (128.97 KiB) Viewed 31681 times
[quote=MrMateczko post_id=17204 time=1569010290]
I doubt he would ever wanted to be associated with such behavior, no matter what you might have thought of him.
....delicate things such as death should be respected.
[/quote]
There's no doubt that the guy was intelligent. I do have to say, that de-compiling Microsoft's work and selling (redistributing) the results, is at best, dubious BEHAVIOR. Then trying to say that nobody can reverse engineer his patch after having done the same thing to Microsoft, well I'll spare you the full details of what I think of that BEHAVIOR. Suffice it to say, it's not good. I plan on revisiting this problem sometime, but no worries, whether I succeed or not, I won't steal his precious-wecious, ill-gotten "intellectual property".
As for death being delicate, it happens to all of us eventually and from what I've seen of it, there's nothing delicate about it.
[attachment=0]death01.jpg[/attachment]