By itself the file (VMM.VXD 4.10.2226) works on Desktops, but is probably completely unnecessary.

Certainly. I apologize too RFMaster, I know there's some catches to all of this and I should test for myself. I will wait for a while before reinstalling 98 SE and look forward to the end result of your work.

I can't speak for PROBLEMCHYLD, but I was just thinking of it because: A) It's the first way I got it to work B) Just poking around with VxDlib, Devlib and rplcldr thought I'd just roll everything up in one. Yeah, I wanna marry it! So it (integration) will work if patched? So let me ask if this meth...

PROBLEMCHYLD, I understand you're being sarcastic, but do realize that there's a lot of nuances with this files and many ways to go about this. I wasn't trying to be rude or obtuse when I was saying 'patience' either, I reread some of my posts and now see how someone could take them that way -- I ho...

I agree with the point that Alex Jones is more than a little over the top, however I think that those who believe that *any* government is an entirely benevolent force simply are not paying attention. I'll say this too, it usually takes many years for any truth to be outed. I know some of what I'm a...

Would that statement be true if you were installing on a "clean" system with less than 1 GB RAM and not patching any files? I hope that makes sense. In other words, is VMM.VXD 4.10.2226 by itself a "special case" and can't/shouldn't be built into VMM32.vxd even on a system not be...

Huh, never spent much time with ME, but what do you know:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/254959

We are getting carried away. We're excited!

Can you rebuild patched VMM32.vxd with VCACHE.vxd from 4.10.2223 Fix?