RFMaster wrote:rloew wrote:I said that because you seem unwilling to let it rest. So suggested you channel your energy elsewhere.
Thank you for the suggestion, i already focused my energy to other things on the same day when i stopped to work on this.
The reason i still talk to you about this is your claim->rloew wrote:Bytes are mine.
Why?
Cuz, if someone can claim something like this, then someone can say for your software or anyone's software. It would be total madness.
You are still nitpicking my use of the word "Bytes". You know what I mean. Suggest something else if it bothers you.
Yes. Anyone can make a similar claim for original work.
It is hardly "total madness". Without it there would no incentive to build upon existing products with Patches or new Code.
rloew wrote:You have not proven that THESE fragments are common at all unless you are talking about the one Byte ones.
Really?
Any application can contain these fragments! End of story.
Examine them and see what the chances are that someone would create them.
Then consider the probability that they would be placed at the specific offsets of my Bytes.
On top of that some of the Patches straddle Instruction boundaries so no Compiler would create them as Code.
All of this assuming that the programmer had no knowledge of my Patches.
rloew wrote:Without copying, a million programmers would not come up with that exact code.
And that is the point around which we can not agree.
You may not claim that you're the only one who can do something.
An expert Programmer would come up with similar code that would do the job but it would not be the exact same code and may not be at the same offsets. They certainly would not add the extra Bytes.
Only a copier would do that.
You can't constantly keep blurry situation, some day you must decide. I gave you a suggestion-
patent your thing if you want to protect your work.
I already responded to that.
You can't stop people to talk about lamp222's files.
People who are opposed to warez would, or at least help insure that they aren't helping search engines find him.
And we can't protect you if people use lamp222's files even if we stop talking about it.
Obviously, but fewer will find them.
You with your claims provoke people to do things that they would not do in a normal circumstances.
Please, stop it once! We can not protect you from yourself.
I have nothing more to say to you on this topic.
If you don't care about the work needed to create Intellectual Property, then there is truly nothing further to say, and the world will be the poorer for it.
