Was that a photo of your mum when you was fabricated? Heheheh.
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
BTW: there is no way to track any Ip numbers if I put my email adress at this board.
There's no doubt that the guy was intelligent. I do have to say, that de-compiling Microsoft's work and selling (redistributing) the results, is at best, dubious BEHAVIOR. Then trying to say that nobody can reverse engineer his patch after having done the same thing to Microsoft, well I'll spare you the full details of what I think of that BEHAVIOR. Suffice it to say, it's not good. I plan on revisiting this problem sometime, but no worries, whether I succeed or not, I won't steal his precious-wecious, ill-gotten "intellectual property".MrMateczko wrote: ↑2019-09-20 22:11I doubt he would ever wanted to be associated with such behavior, no matter what you might have thought of him.
....delicate things such as death should be respected.
Go fuck yourself, I will never ever delete anything from here unless required by law.MrMateczko wrote: ↑2019-09-20 22:11...At the very least, removing the controversial images/posts from pages 48 and 49 should be necessary...
That is a great idea.MrMateczko wrote: ↑2019-09-22 21:32...I have plans to develop my own open-source RAM patch based on my own reverse-engineering work, as well as an another open-source project that would be very beneficial for 98SE/ME users. This would be my tribute to his work, regardless of how people viewed his business model.
Someone's death is never enough reason to alter the past. It has nothing to do with disrespecting or respecting death. You don't go around altering history or deleting old forum posts just because someone died. As a matter of fact, in my humble opinion, it is especially important to KEEP the old records UNALTERED... but hey, that's just me.MrMateczko wrote: ↑2019-09-20 22:11...While I know this forum is an open hydepark, delicate things such as death should be respected.
Well put. I certainly did not intend to make light of his death. All the same, (perhaps just restating what ! said in a different way) someone's death isn't a reason to vilify them or pretend that they were a saint.! wrote: ↑2019-09-29 05:10Someone's death is never enough reason to alter the past. It has nothing to do with disrespecting or respecting death. You don't go around altering history or deleting old forum posts just because someone died. As a matter of fact, in my humble opinion, it is especially important to KEEP the old records UNALTERED... but hey, that's just me.![]()
![]()