Low IQ ZDNet Trolls
Posted: 2013-11-12 16:58
Today I came across an article on ZDNet: http://www.zdnet.com/why-ive-all-but-gi ... 000023083/. I don't have time to read it, nor do I really give a fuck about it, but skimmed through it and obviously it's stuff I already know about the repugnant backdoored piece of shit Windows 8.x. Of course, without fail, the MicroTroll low IQ dumbbells come along and start writing their masterpiece writings (comments). The problem which arises on articles that have lots of comments, is that if you write a comment, it's just going to get buried in the other hundreds of comments and you're not really changing much of anything. Now, if you can get your comment in at the beginning, you obviously have a better chance of having it read. The days of me of posting comments on ZDNet are over for now; I guess you could call it a vacation. I had my fun (been banned a few times too), in an uninhibited and straightforward manner pointing out the back doors in Windows 8, the atrocious and hideous user interface flaws, and the infantilizing colors. It sure stirred up a lot of controversy, but I just found that entertaining trolls was starting to waste my time. These days, more users are taking the trolls on. I'm not sure if I helped plant the seed or not, but I think people are finally getting it that Windows 8.x just fucking sucks. I even talk to non-computer literate people who think Windows 8.x is a piece of rubbish. That piece of shit heinous start screen is just so damn bad, with its tablet applications that are full of ads and certainly not design for intelligent life, that it serves two types of individuals only: the mentally retarded and children under 4 years old. Microsoft can take their stupid ass, rotten, outrageously idiotic operating system and shove it right up their ass. Speaking of the mentally retarded, here's one of the most retarded comments I have ever read on the internet. I don't know where these people come from; they just meander their way through the woodwork and manage to get online to show the world their retardation:
Okay, where do I begin. First of all, you fucking fucktard, you don't have to come on Zdnet (sic), as nobody is forcing you. There are plenty of other sites that preach to the choir -- where you yourself can plant your fat dumbass in the chair you bought with your welfare check -- and read on your Surface P.O.S. all about how great Windows 8.x is. Secondly, ZDNet has a myriad of articles which show Windows 8.x in a positive light. Thirdly, The Verge rated Windows 8.1 very highly.
The idiot then writes something that makes zero sense: "Why doesn't MS underwrite the creation of sites users can go to, and not have to put up with rubbish? Why doesn't MS do something?" What the hell is he talking about? To underwrite means to to give money to support and agree to be responsible for any losses if it fails/ to agree to pay for a certain kind of loss or damage by offering (an insurance policy) (taken from Merriam-Webster). Is he saying that MS should fund creation of new sites users can go to, so they can remain in complete control of content posted (censorship)? Maybe you guys can shed light on that comment, because the only thing I'm coming up with is that this person is so dumb that he can probably barely tie his own shoelaces. Then he goes on to say: "Why doesn't MS do something?" Well, doing something would be releasing a product which is actually useable, but I know that that line of thinking (thinking outside of the box) is just not possible for this poor individual. Well, that's my little Windows 8.x rant for today.
Again, MS just sits there and let its haters bash it over and over again
The bigger question is why do I have to come to Zdnet daily, to read writers invent reasons why MS products are inferior. Why can't I find major new sites that are pro Microsoft? Zdnet, Cnet, The Verge, etc. all hate MS and its products. Why doesn't MS underwrite the creation of sites users can go to, and not have to put up with rubbish? Why doesn't MS do something?
P. Douglas
Okay, where do I begin. First of all, you fucking fucktard, you don't have to come on Zdnet (sic), as nobody is forcing you. There are plenty of other sites that preach to the choir -- where you yourself can plant your fat dumbass in the chair you bought with your welfare check -- and read on your Surface P.O.S. all about how great Windows 8.x is. Secondly, ZDNet has a myriad of articles which show Windows 8.x in a positive light. Thirdly, The Verge rated Windows 8.1 very highly.
The idiot then writes something that makes zero sense: "Why doesn't MS underwrite the creation of sites users can go to, and not have to put up with rubbish? Why doesn't MS do something?" What the hell is he talking about? To underwrite means to to give money to support and agree to be responsible for any losses if it fails/ to agree to pay for a certain kind of loss or damage by offering (an insurance policy) (taken from Merriam-Webster). Is he saying that MS should fund creation of new sites users can go to, so they can remain in complete control of content posted (censorship)? Maybe you guys can shed light on that comment, because the only thing I'm coming up with is that this person is so dumb that he can probably barely tie his own shoelaces. Then he goes on to say: "Why doesn't MS do something?" Well, doing something would be releasing a product which is actually useable, but I know that that line of thinking (thinking outside of the box) is just not possible for this poor individual. Well, that's my little Windows 8.x rant for today.