-
``-_-´´
" Our internet traffic, 2014-02: 199 GB "
Cause for concern? (I looked at namecheap.com for several minutes, plenty
options there but didn't find the webpage outlining the 'Value' Plan.)
Guess hxxp://www.foolsdesign.org/styles/art_d ... s/0001.png
454.54 KB , (called via styles.css), must contribute to that a bit?
Strategies needed to reduce bandwidth consumed? (e.g. non-logged-in visitors
are served 3 sequential webpages whole, thereafter above PNG and avatars are
prevented from being served with succeeding webpages? is that even possible?)
Do the monitoring tools allow you to determine the ratio of bandwidth consumed
'members (logged-in) v unlogged-in visitors' ?
(Ha, ha... or when the last time that guy using Win3.1 visited?)
Cause for concern? (I looked at namecheap.com for several minutes, plenty
options there but didn't find the webpage outlining the 'Value' Plan.)
Guess hxxp://www.foolsdesign.org/styles/art_d ... s/0001.png
454.54 KB , (called via styles.css), must contribute to that a bit?
Strategies needed to reduce bandwidth consumed? (e.g. non-logged-in visitors
are served 3 sequential webpages whole, thereafter above PNG and avatars are
prevented from being served with succeeding webpages? is that even possible?)
Do the monitoring tools allow you to determine the ratio of bandwidth consumed
'members (logged-in) v unlogged-in visitors' ?
(Ha, ha... or when the last time that guy using Win3.1 visited?)
I had Wfw 3.11 connected to internet once, but I did not try to visit this place. IE2 barely showed my own site lol.
I am on 98SE, but due to compatibility settings the browers report Win2K.
I am on 98SE, but due to compatibility settings the browers report Win2K.
-
Fool's design
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 2013-02-14 10:11
@EMPTORXC,
There is no need for concern. We used to be hosted at Namecheap but we moved out of it due to their CPU % limit. As you can read the "About" section, we do currently have a nice plan with two mirrored virtual servers at tilaa.com (they are excellent by the way), thanks to the folks at ParanormalStories.com that allowed us to move in with them.
You are right that the 0001.png is big but not that big because it is cached on the visitors' browsers so it isn't re-downloaded too often. We do allow attachments in all posts and those attachments are viewable by all visitors, anonymous and members. There is also some cache going on in the background which allow us to save CPU cycles, so for now, we are OK but thank you for asking and your good suggestions.
There is no need for concern. We used to be hosted at Namecheap but we moved out of it due to their CPU % limit. As you can read the "About" section, we do currently have a nice plan with two mirrored virtual servers at tilaa.com (they are excellent by the way), thanks to the folks at ParanormalStories.com that allowed us to move in with them.
You are right that the 0001.png is big but not that big because it is cached on the visitors' browsers so it isn't re-downloaded too often. We do allow attachments in all posts and those attachments are viewable by all visitors, anonymous and members. There is also some cache going on in the background which allow us to save CPU cycles, so for now, we are OK but thank you for asking and your good suggestions.
-
Scorpius
EMPTORXC wrote:...Cause for concern?...
Not for now. From a cash flow point of view, we should be OK for at least one year. I posted the traffic just for fun so no worries. Hopefully, we aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
Just relax and enjoy the ride!
- farscapenerve3.jpg (22.12 KiB) Viewed 5854 times