http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-pr ... -rt-owners
Interesting that there are so many imperfections in that photo ( why would NeoWin even bother watermarking it ). They have the blur, the overhead reflection, severe glare, carpet fuzzies.
All in all a fine example of a product photo that normally gets tossed rather than approved. Kids today, they seriously have no skill, no judgment, no talent ... no clue.
Interesting that there are so many imperfections in that photo ( why would NeoWin even bother watermarking it ). They have the blur, the overhead reflection, severe glare, carpet fuzzies.
All in all a fine example of a product photo that normally gets tossed rather than approved. Kids today, they seriously have no skill, no judgment, no talent ... no clue.
Here's an article about PR photos supposedly pulled by ABC (American Broadcasting Company) shortly after they were posted:
http://petapixel.com/2013/09/13/abc-pul ... mo-photos/
I have to admit, these are very awful.
http://petapixel.com/2013/09/13/abc-pul ... mo-photos/
I have to admit, these are very awful.