Again, MS just sits there and let its haters bash it over and over again
The bigger question is why do I have to come to Zdnet daily, to read writers invent reasons why MS products are inferior. Why can't I find major new sites that are pro Microsoft? Zdnet, Cnet, The Verge, etc. all hate MS and its products. Why doesn't MS underwrite the creation of sites users can go to, and not have to put up with rubbish? Why doesn't MS do something?
P. Douglas
Okay, where do I begin. First of all, you fucking fucktard, you don't have to come on Zdnet (sic), as nobody is forcing you. There are plenty of other sites that preach to the choir -- where you yourself can plant your fat dumbass in the chair you bought with your welfare check -- and read on your Surface P.O.S. all about how great Windows 8.x is. Secondly, ZDNet has a myriad of articles which show Windows 8.x in a positive light. Thirdly, The Verge rated Windows 8.1 very highly.
The idiot then writes something that makes zero sense: "Why doesn't MS underwrite the creation of sites users can go to, and not have to put up with rubbish? Why doesn't MS do something?" What the hell is he talking about? To underwrite means to to give money to support and agree to be responsible for any losses if it fails/ to agree to pay for a certain kind of loss or damage by offering (an insurance policy) (taken from Merriam-Webster). Is he saying that MS should fund creation of new sites users can go to, so they can remain in complete control of content posted (censorship)? Maybe you guys can shed light on that comment, because the only thing I'm coming up with is that this person is so dumb that he can probably barely tie his own shoelaces. Then he goes on to say: "Why doesn't MS do something?" Well, doing something would be releasing a product which is actually useable, but I know that that line of thinking (thinking outside of the box) is just not possible for this poor individual. Well, that's my little Windows 8.x rant for today.