Installation, updates, general problem solving and assistance.
rloew

2014-06-18 13:37 »

RFMaster wrote:I wonder if he even understands how much damage he make to me with this pointless story?

I spent too much time on this.

Everything i expected of him from te first post of talk with him is to show us a solid, unequivocal and undeniable evidence

that lamp222 stole his patch!

That's all i ask.

If he show us such proof i will delete my patcher and everything related to it cuz it is based on lamp222 work.

^techtalk.cc
No, i will not wait for european court order. If he show us evidence i will delete my patcher immediately!
Because i do not support warez-piracy-cracks.

But he show us valid evidence and that's all.

What is your explanation for what I said earlier about the code?

RFMaster

2014-06-18 13:45 »

What?

What is available for check is cheked and it is clear the they have nothing in common your code.

If you can proof otherwise, do it, show us. How many times i need to say this?

rloew

2014-06-18 13:53 »

RFMaster wrote:What?

What is available for check is cheked and it is clear the they have nothing in common your code.

If you can proof otherwise, do it, show us. How many times i need to say this?

Did you run the test exactly as I described?
If you did, there would be 5 areas of differences.
1. Your mod at offset 0x3D.
2. A small signature at 0xFFFC.
3. The large signature at 0x10380.
4. A 6 Byte Patch at 0x1ECB8.
5. A 20 Byte Patch at 0x2EE28.

I tested with the English Version but I don't think it matters.

All of the other Patches would be the same.

RFMaster

2014-06-18 14:03 »

With newer versions no, i did not.

I will do it right now. Just wait a little...

User avatar
techtalk.cc
100%
Posts: 1404
Joined: 2014-02-27 07:51
Contact:

2014-06-18 15:01 »

RFMaster wrote:...^techtalk.cc
No, i will not wait for european court order. If he show us evidence i will delete my patcher immediately!
Because i do not support warez-piracy-cracks.

But he show us valid evidence and that's all.

Absolutely, not a problem.

User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2014-06-18 15:03 »

rloew wrote:...You remind me of "98 guy". Many years ago he accused me of lying when I said I had a solution to the 137GB Hard Disk Limit. He also refused to test my Demo to see that it worked. In the end he slinked off into oblivion, but not before creating a flame war that actually reached a level of fame.

Go fuck yourself.

User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2014-06-18 15:08 »

@RFMaster,

Remember, even if your program does exactly the same thing as his, it doesn't mean yours is illegal! It is like saying other word processors are illegal because they alter the files in the same manner.

:arrow: That is NOT illegal in Europe.

User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2014-06-18 15:09 »

@RFMaster,

Ps. Of course, if you decide to pull your patch, then we will comply and remove the data because you have copyright on your patch. :grin:

User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2014-06-18 15:15 »

@rloew,

Why don't you test it yourself by the way? You are the accuser, you bear the burden of proof.

rloew

2014-06-18 15:23 »

Non Hic wrote:@rloew,

Why don't you test it yourself by the way? You are the accuser, you bear the burden of proof.

I see you definitely still have your foot in your mouth.
Obviously I tested it. I got the results I described earlier.

While you are busy acting stupid, RFMaster is running the test.

Post Reply