Have you ever found something really badly designed? Something which obscurity of its functions makes it hard to understand its use? Something almost unusable to a point it would drive you mad using it too often? Perhaps, a fool's design? Then you have come to the right place. Post your findings here and help making the world a saner place.
Post Reply
User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2013-08-23 14:16 »

MW-BG391_pfacar_20130805162654_MG.jpg
MW-BG391_pfacar_20130805162654_MG.jpg (45.2 KiB) Viewed 11735 times
Top
CharlotteTheHarlot

2013-08-23 16:28 »

They didn't even bother using a camera for that one!

It is clearly masked with a Gaussian on the selection.

But for what purpose? "Hi mom, this is me at work!"
Top
User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2013-08-24 02:50 »

This one is supposed to be showing a Samsung OLED TV... three words: What the fuck? :(

008_Samsung_OLED_35823374_610x407.jpg
008_Samsung_OLED_35823374_610x407.jpg (18 KiB) Viewed 11730 times
Top
CharlotteTheHarlot

2013-08-24 09:35 »

outlookwebmailfinal_1020_large_verge_medium_landscape.jpg
outlookwebmailfinal_1020_large_verge_medium_landscape.jpg (124.94 KiB) Viewed 11728 times

Well at least the word "Junk" is in focus. Surely they mean modern Outlook.

P.S. that photo comes from this page ...

http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/21/46444 ... mail-alias

... what an obfuscated mess of HTML and scripts that source is. Their page loads are terrible ( Dear: The Verge, you suck ), just look at the code and see why.
Top
User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2013-08-26 16:35 »

What a wonderful blur!

march 19, 2013-untitled shoot-029.jpg
march 19, 2013-untitled shoot-029.jpg (27.92 KiB) Viewed 11719 times
Top
User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2013-08-26 16:37 »

Another sad picture from some advertisement "Learn how to do more" ...blur with your dSLR (Digital single-lens reflex camera). Now with 1000% more blur!

Perhaps Pentax should sue them and have that picture removed? Hardly a nice commercial for a Pentax camera. :lol:

dSLR fool.PNG
dSLR fool.PNG (192.34 KiB) Viewed 11719 times
Top
User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2013-08-26 22:00 »

This picture is from the Wikipedia article about dSLR. A Pentax brought to you by... *drum roll* blur bastards! It too is blurry! :lol: :lol: :lol:

600px-Pentax_K-x_IMG_2159.jpg
600px-Pentax_K-x_IMG_2159.jpg (49.71 KiB) Viewed 11716 times
Top
Fredledingue

2013-08-27 00:56 »

Yes, this is ridiculous because originaly blurr were produced intentionaly or not, by the field depth of the camera lens.
Blurring pictures manualy just to make look like it focused on something sucks royaly.
Top
User avatar
!
30%
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2013-02-25 18:36

2013-08-28 00:04 »

Another perfectly crisp picture from Neowin...

shutterstock_130538774.jpg
shutterstock_130538774.jpg (54.19 KiB) Viewed 11706 times
Top
CharlotteTheHarlot

2013-08-28 04:30 »

Non Hic wrote:This picture is from the Wikipedia article about dSLR. A Pentax brought to you by... *drum roll* blur bastards! It too is blurry! :lol: :lol: :lol:

600px-Pentax_K-x_IMG_2159.jpg


God, that is just so ironic.
Top
Post Reply